User talk:pablo X/Archive1

yahn (2005—2007) | tahn (2009 part 1) | tether (2009 part 2) | mether(2010) | mumph (2011)

hither (2012) | lither (2013) | auver | dauver | dic

Bass guitar

To be honest, I found the whole etymology debate a storm in a teacup.

As far as the electric bass is concerned, there is no doubt that Leo Fender designed the original Precision Bass to allow guitarists to fulfil the double bass role in a group. Thus it can rightly be said to be derived from both guitar (playing position, frets [hence "precision" for guitarists unused to fretless instruments], body shape) AND double bass (tuning, longer scale, intended musical role). --Dburgess 03:25, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

" No doubt" and "rightly"? Please do your research. Leo fender did not design the first solid body, horizontal, fretted electric bass. I suspect he was very aware of the widely publicised Audiovox "electric bass fiddle" of the late thirties. The the original Precision Bass was a replacement for the double bass. The "Precision" label was a reference to the fact that imprecise intonation sounded awful when amplified and particularly bad in studio recordings. The etymology debate may be a storm in a teacup to people who don't care, but it is ignorant to label a bassist a guitarist. The fact that the design made it easier for a guitarist to play a bass instrument did not make a guitarist a bassist. Believe me, I have seen plenty of guitarists playing a bass and it is just bad bass playing. A very different approach and thinking is required to properly fulfill the role of a bass player.Ozbass 13:45, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well ad hominem's one thing but ad the bloody wrong hominem is ridiculous. Please take your argument with dburgess elsewhere. If you have anything to say to me, do it here. pablo_hablo.

My apologies, Ozbass 10:43, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"One is the loneliest number"

You are entitled to your POV that the entries in the number articles are "for amusement." But entries on numbers in song lyrics can be confusing to anyone who doesn't know the song in question. Anton Mravcek 18:33, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bass (disambiguation)

I think it serves no useful purpose, but there are some users who feel it necessary to have a disambiguation page, and when they spot one doesn't exist with the word 'disambiguation' in parentheses included in the title, will go and make one. I think it is therefore best to keep it as is, so that everyone can see it is not really doing anything because the 'bass' article is doing it. The point is that people continually and unthinkingly create links pointing to 'bass' without realising it's ambiguous, but they don't create links pointing to 'bass (disambiguation)' unthinkingly. Therefore it is 'bass' that needs to be a disambiguation article for all those following such links. We could then point 'bass' to 'bass (disambiguation)', but it hardly seems worth it. Does this make sense? Brequinda 14:30, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New user box

Hello Paul, It's Moe Epsilon. Im giving you the user box for your user page called Template:User Member. It's a user box that says your a member of the AWWDMBJ.... Hope you like it! — Moe ε 04:23, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bougereau Gallery

You have edited the William-Adolphe Bouguereau gallery. It has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. The deletion discussion is here. A proposal to modify the policy is here. Please join either or both discussions and comment as you see fit. Dsmdgold 16:07, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lyke Wake Dirge

You asked about those 2nds in my transcription of the Young Tradition version of the Dirge. I did that many years ago for a folk band that I played in at the time, then more recently found it and adapted it for two tenors and a bass viol. However, I don't think I have changed any of the lines (intentionally). Certainly, I wrote down the first two bars of verse two with different harmonisation (and different tune) from verse 1. My recollection is that verse 1 starts with the middle voice in unison with the top voice and then repeats the same phrase in bar 2, as I have notated. Verse 2, bar 2, looks like F-D-E in the top part, D-D-C# in the middle, and Bb-G-A in the bass. I agree that my verse 1 does look a bit odd. I still have the vinyl album and will try to play it at the weekend and check whether I still agree with my transcription! Also, I will check the original key (which I have almost certainly changed at some time) and make sure that I have the parts in the right order (I sometimes have difficulty telling which is the top part and which the middle). Bluewave 14:01, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I had another listen to the Dirge and the original seems to be a tone higher than I wrote it (I probably transposed it at the time I did the version for viols to make it nicer for the bass viol). I have updated the copy on Wikimedia. However, I still think I have got that second bar pretty much right. I would welcome another opinion and have put an mp3 of the phrase at http://www.martleweb.co.uk/temp/lyke.mp3. What do you think? Bluewave 19:57, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bertie's cabal

Dear Paul:

I've read and reread and reread and reread and reread your little addition to Wikipedia:List of cabals. Obviously, your intent was to define a cabal of all members those cabals that are not (yet) listed in the List of cabals. However, your definition of Bertie's cabal, due to an error of logic, makes Bertie's cabal more "elusive" than you could have imagined: your definition guaranties that Bertie's cabal will have no members. The definition can easily be altered to conform to what was obviously your true intent; I'll leave you to puzzle that solution out for yourself. More seriously, you have stumbled upon a boo-boo that threatens the very foundations of everything we think we know. Worse even than that, your unwitting discovery has so agitated me that I can no longer function as productive member of society. I must do something to relax. I think I will go out and treat myself to a nice barber's shave—provided I can satisfy his peculiar requirement for accepting customers. Finell (Talk) 04:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User Talk: 75.33.29.54

I recall blocking that user but, due to the length of time is has been since I blocked the page and the fact that the page is no longer existent, I do not recall my reason at this time. If you could somehow tell me what was on that page, as honest as possible, maybe I can remember my reason for blocking that page. Thanks! Redsox04 21:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lord of the Flies

Not bad form at all, I appreciate the correction. Not sure what I was thinking; but it was probably the nationalism in me trying to turn Golding into an American =). It's now fixed. As a sidenote, your comment proves that people do look at my userpage (all the time I have put into it is not a waste!). Thanks! --Spangineer (háblame) 15:58, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)

bot - archive please pablomismo_|\talk 09:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hidden Page Award

User:Destructo 087/Userboxes/Hiddenpage

bot - archive please pablomismo_|\talk 09:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: the llama song

I just wanted to know why it was deleted, and nothing more. cold someone please tell me?Smartyshoe 21:44, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A big boy did it and ran away

(Look, Mr. Tracy, I left the computer unattended while my deliquant nephew was on. He was the one doing the damage to the list of episodes. He just got on my name and did damage but it was fixed so lets forgive and forget. Please dont ban me from Wikipedia) From TSSSM 6-22-07 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tsssm (talk • contribs) 22:15, 22 June 2007

I'm not an administrator, and I can't ban anyone. I was just warning you that somebody would probably block you. pablomismo_|\talk 07:12, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism question

How is editing YOUR OWN PAGE from THE SAME IP AS IT'S LISTED UNDER "vandalism" you fucking mongoloid?--59.105.17.165 09:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mainly because it's not 'your' page. Removal of warnings from talk pages is vandalism. pablomismo_|\talk 10:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Eduardo

Who are you????????—Preceding unsigned comment added by Eduardo10390 (talk • contribs) 16:25, 16 June 2007

me

pablo_hablo. 16:30, 16 June 2007

Adam Heyer

Sir. The short article i wrote regarding Adam Heyer was from a verifiable source ( the life and times of Alcapone) so put that in your pipe and smoke it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Therenegade07 (talk • contribs) 07:13, 24 June 2007

Replied on your talk page. I don't smoke a pipe. pablomismo_|\

Re: Argos Translations/page protection

Hi. Yes, I see it's been deleted four times already. Only an administrator can protect a page against recreation by normal users, and is usually done at their own discretion for articles that get recreated repeatedly to the point of becoming a nuisance. You can request protection at WP:RFP - just follow the instructions there (read WP:PROT first if you're not familiar with Wikipedia's protection policies). ~Matticus ^T_C 17:04, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Notability of Ryan Trecartin (Activist)

This is an article about a particular individual who helped lead to the awareness of the Liger. Her "notablility" is that she is of a very small group of individuals that promote this awareness. Without her promoting awareness of the Liger, it is very likely that this species of animal could become extinct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimaster789 (talk • contribs) 20:48, 30 June 2007

Really? Without sources to back this up, it doesn't look notable. Try Google to see if there are any matches for the string +"Ryan Trecartin" +Liger, that would be a start. pablomismo_|\talk 21:01, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wait... second means second?

Don't use 'sophomore' (whch means nothing to most people) when you mean 'second' (which means second). Please.

Last time I looked "second" meant a unit of time... nah, just givin' ya shit. You have a point. There's a lot of misuse of the term "sophomore" because people like to seem more intelligent by using words that are often introduced in a tertiary setting, but this is an American trait where to use the longer versions of words seems the cool thing to do... or so I've observed. --linca ^linca 03:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

replied on your talk page pablomismo_|\talk 08:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where

Where is the "article talk page" button located? I got the "your page will most likely be deleted because it features blatant advertising" message, and need to leave a message for the administrators on the talk page to dispute their claim.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Cinephile333 (talk • contribs) 21:36, 4 July 2007)

There is a row of tabs at the top of the article above its title. The first says "article" the second says "discussion". Click on that one one and it will take you to the article's talk page. You can sign your posts by entering four tildes, like this ~~~~. pablo_|\talk 21:40, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia/aidepikiW

I thought it was funny too. Too bad the whole API thing managed to wind up in there. That page'll be deleted and you'll have nowhere to go for a mirror of the original article when all hell breaks loose. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MoreThanMike (talk • contribs) 06:02, 5 July 2007

We'll just have to take a chance on that. You could try Uncyclopedia. pablo_|\talk 08:18, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danny M. Francis

Hi Pablomismo, Just so that you know, when an article is an exact copy of another website or whatever, the article can be speedy deleted, which is faster and more efficient that the Copyvio route. See WP:CSD for more info. It was a great catch though! I will hop on over and nominate it for speedy deletion. Slp1 21:51, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see the permission on the talkpage now, so forget it! Sorry --Slp1 21:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was no permission earlier though! pablo_|\talk 23:04, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with it?

Creator of the page Memory Crusher —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrigty (talk • contribs) 15:54, 7 July 2007

replied on your talk page

pablo_hablo. 16:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Living waters

Interesting question, which we are now trying to straighten out at WT:CSD--the original wording was "groups" and it was interpreted as meaning bands and clubs. I think the intention is still the same, but who can say what the consensus around here will develop?. In the meantime, it's safer to use prod--which generally works just as well. I almost always use prod myself, though I have the ability to delete in a single step.

My feeling on the immediate issue is that anything which would be known to give rise to a controversy at AfD should be speedied, and local churches and congregations generally do. There is no real consensus on them or other local articles (incidentally, I almost always say to delete them, but there are one or two people who speak up for them all. ) And more generally, there's been a problem with people nominating articles on probably notable people or things for speedy as non-notable, or no content. So some admins who have been actually deleting when it doesnt match the rules have been getting flack, & I want to stay far clear of that. DGG (talk) 20:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but seeing as the template itself cites "It is an article about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject. " (my emboldening) then I'm quite happy with speedy deletion rather than prod. Otherwise why is this article more legitimate than Tunbridge Wells Psychopathic Gay Society or any other group of people?

pablo_hablo. 23:14, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why democracy

I redirected this to Why democracy?, the user's other contribution. Please do with it what you wish. MKoltnow 23:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(transferred from User_Talk:MKoltnow)

Thanks, I've marked that one as advertising as well. pablo ._{... talk ...} 23:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning users for nonsense pages.

A few words of advice: when warning users who created nonsense pages, use {{subst:nonsensepages|the page's title}}. It gives a better, more relevant warning. Thanks, Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 23:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can always use {{subst:test1article|article name}} instead. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 23:57, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not vandilising Wikipedia...

Don't just assume because a piece of information is new that someone is vandalising Wikipedia...

What do you actually know about Aspergers?

Do you have it?

Moron

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Marktinley (talk • contribs) 19:50, 8 July 2007

copied from User talk:Marktinley

I assume you are referring to the article Aspergineering which, if I remember correctly is a term you coined. I nominated it for deletion because, as it says above, it is a non-notable neologism. It has now been deleted three times so it would seem that I'm not the only one who thinks this. Your statement claiming you are not "vandilising Wikipedia" is weakened by the facts; you've reposted deleted material and you have left an uncivil and abusive message.

Whether I have Asperger's is no concern of yours or anyone else's.

Finally, you can sign your message on talk pages by typing four tildes ~~~~; this will save any confusion, your message on my talk page looks like it is signed "Moron".

pablo_hablo. 20:08, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was signed Moron - what part of that didn't you understand... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marktinley (talk • contribs) 20:20, 8 July 2007

Psychovandal

Based on recent conversation, this user is likely a sock of Avianmosuito‎ (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), as is 71.112.163.173 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Thanks for the reverts. --Finngall ^talk 22:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.

pablo_hablo. 23:06, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Donoghue disambiguation

Hi

Your question of what I was doing with the bare disambiguation page came in the middle of a series of small edits I was making. I noticed that the link to John Donoghue provided on a list of distinguished Brown alumni and faculty was in fact a link to an article about a 19th century pioneer of Australia. I had never done a disambiguation page before, and after a brief trip to the sandbox, I tried it out on the new page.

Thanks for providing those helpful links. :)

AdamKidabra 22:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page pablo_hablo. 22:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Therenegade07

You`re doing a mighty fine job Mr Pablomismo!....Not much gets past you that is not from a `verifiable` source. Keep up the great work ole chap.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Therenegade07 (talk • contribs) 10:32, 10 July 2007

Hi! How's the Adam Heyer research going? pablo_hablo. 10 July 2007 (UTC)

"Quote" Pablomismo... Hows the Adam Heyer research going? "unquote"

Yes - going quite well thanks. I will endeavour to contribute this (Adam Heyer article)… and other articles on Chicago gangsters asap.

Best regards, Therenegade07

I'll look forward to it - it's a fascinating era. pablo_hablo. 19:08, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greenhill & Company article deletion without a trace

Hi Pablo. This paragraph is not about the underlying question of whether or not the article should be in wiki, but instead about what happened to the article and related edits once you flagged it for deletion. I'm trying to do some research to understand how Wikipedia works with respect to the above removed article. Perhaps this is the way Wiki normally works, but there are a few things that seem odd. First, there appears to be no trace of the deleted article. Second, all record of contribution edits are missing. Thus, not just the original edit which created the article about Greenhill & Co., LLC. is missing from my contribution history, as is your edit flagging the article for speedy deletion missing from your history, but my edit requesting review of the flag. Also missing are the articles Talk page and any edits to it. This includes my history lost the logging of the edits to the tthe Talk page for the article. Clearly, my intent was to initiate a discussion but it appears that the article was deleted solely based upon your flag. Could you explain your comment that you were not able to delete it? You obviously were able to flag it. Who deletes it, is it just an automated process? Thanks in advance for your help. I'll independently look into the process for bringing the article issue for an administrator / editor to appeal your flag and don't want that issue to cloud my genuine failure to comprehend what might likely be ordinary course process for wikipedia "spam" deletion. Again, I appreciate your alerting me to flag as soon as it was done. I do not question your motivation, just wish that more time could have been spent on the facts. Knowsetfree 18:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page pablo_hablo. 19:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Greenhill & Company

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Greenhill & Company. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Hi Pablo, I've found additional facts not in the original article which I believe establishes the significance and relevance of the article that was deleted. Just giving you the heads up in case you want to join in. Thanks again for your help. Knowsetfree 01:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't get there in time, but looks like you got some good advice. pablo_hablo.

Thank you

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my user page (and for editing the sophomoronic thing). You rock! Cheers, #29^(talk) 17:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - your vandal is indefinitely blocked now, so I suppose we can look forward to him cropping up in disguise soon! pablo_hablo. 19:08, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, seems you were right. (Did you notice some dude blocked me cos I was possibly a bot? :D) #29^(talk) 20:34, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that - there must be a lot of suspicious people around who haven't discovered the delights of tabbed browsing! pablo_hablo.

Deletion

Hi,

i recently did a quick artical on the Colombos new Capo. Josh Da Goodfella.

He is a real person and i have met him and his family before.

He is a real person and recent Capo Of The Family

Could you tell me why its been put up for deletion

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Officialmafia (talk • contribs) 09:42, 14 July 2007

Hi. This article is copied directly from the page at officialmafia.com. That's one reason for deleting it, you can't post pages that are copies of other pages.

There is no assertion of notability, and no independent, verifiable sources quoted. In fact there is no proof that this person exists - your assertion that you have met him is not enough.

This, and your other edits seem to serve mainly to point readers toward the website officialmafia.com which is very similar to your username. pablo_hablo. 09:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thats my webpage! www.officialmafia.com

My email address is Joshdagoodfella@officialmafia.com

I know him quite well, and i could get him to contact you,—Preceding unsigned comment added by Officialmafia (talk • contribs)

I don't want him to contact me. What you need to do is demonstrate why this person should have an encyclopaedia article here. Did you follow the links in my post above? - I'll put them here again: copied, verifiable, very similar to your username, officialmafia.com. There is quite a lot of information there about how to create an article. pablo_hablo. 10:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported your username (see post on your talk page) as it concerns me that most of your edits are links to, or copied from, your own website. pablo_hablo. 10:40, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo, SPA disruptive and forum shopping. AIV. He's created the same nonsense. Mike33 14:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

addendum Officialmafia indefinately blocked re concerns raised above see [[1]] Mike33 23:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boomers

hello? I am confused. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boomers1882 (talk • contribs) 09:51, 14 July 2007

Tell me more and I will unconfuse you if I can. Please could youy sign your posts on talk pages (you can do this by typing four tildes like this ~~~~

pablo_hablo. 09:57, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads-up

One of your correspondents has posted here. Interesting. Most of the Mafioso wannabes I have run across seem to be a year or two older. --CliffC 13:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Following is copied from User talk:CliffC in line with new policy of keeping conversaions intact

Thanks for the heads-up, I'll keep an eye to see if any other editor responds. Why this crime family would appoint a seventeen-year old British kid to their ranks is indeed interesting! pablo_hablo. 13:10, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bugsy siegel(rapper)

Bugsy siegel(rapper), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Bugsy siegel(rapper) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bugsy siegel(rapper) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Bugsy siegel(rapper) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 07:30, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bizarre. I didn't create it, but I did move it from this title to one with a capital 'S'. Neither survived a look at notability however. pablo_hablo.

Corinna, Corinna

Thank you for helping me get the photo there! I know Corinna will like this when she sees it.

She does not deserve all the hatesites, many were created against her simply because she is a Christian. These hate sites are awful I have seen them.

This article is honest, and not cruel like the hate sites.

Is the page safe? If I go to sleep will it still be there in the morning? I worked so very hard on it and thank you for taking the time to actually help me. I know you are really busy. THANK YOU. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahylju (talk • contribs) 07:47, 15 July 2007

Sarah

Anyone can edit the page, anyone can nominate it for deletion. It certainly looks better than it did, but some more sources would help. pablo_hablo. 07:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I need HELP.

Please help me.

Someone wrote that it looks like Corinna Fugate wrote the article but I wrote the article , me, Sarah.

Please tell me the page is safe so I can get some sleep it is 3AM here.

Please help and thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahylju (talk • contribs) 08:08, 15 July 2007

You can see why they might be confused - you do identify with Corinna a lot. Anyway, as I said before, the page can be edited by anyone (check the page history and you will see a list of edits). The more verifiable, independent sources you have, the better.

Please always sign your posts on talk pages (particularly mine) by typing four tildes thus ~~~~. It makes it a lot easier to read. pablo_hablo. 08:31, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I cant find my password to do it.

Not the same.

I am so tired..

When I was turning the computer off for sleep I saw people wrote "Kill Snow White"

Saying they were going to take down Corinna Fugate's article.

They said it was a hate site against corinna which it is not, and they were saying the photo was copyright and could not be used.

I have permission to use the photo

Plus the link they have claming it is another photo is incorrect.

What is happening? I am so tired and dont know what to do I have been at this for while now and am getting depressed.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarah127jjj (talk • contribs) 09:05, 15 July 2007

I can't see these comments on the image. Get some sleep. Please sign your posts. ~~~~ pablo_hablo. 09:42, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nah.

'noticeable' was just sloppy. dependence, independence, etc., I have a known issue with, and I keep *doing* it. Every damn time, I think I'm getting it right, and it still always seems to be the wrong guess ;-P I think I'm going to have it tattooed on my wrist or something. --Thespian 12:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've just made 3 typos in a three-word edit summary so I know how you feel. I keep using [[ when I mean to use {{ and vice versa. pablo_hablo. 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Fellacion article

I've already contested your deletion flag with a brief plea on the discussion page to the article, again, please give time for me to complete the article, if not, perhaps it is best as a stub until then?

Thanks

jazzzyman —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazzzyman 2000 (talk • contribs) 23:08, 15 July 2007

These feelings are natural, but the article is … gone. pablo_hablo. 23:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're fast!

You got around to nominating how to get the perfect abs before I did. ~Crowstar~ 21:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As long as someone does it! Mind you, I'll never have those perfect abs now … pablo_hablo. 21:21, 17 July 2007

Thanks

hey thanks for teling me about the verifying thing... i think i did it rite, can you check it on the degrassi high bad blood pt 1 page? thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by PeaceLova13 (talk • contribs) 05:59, 19 July 2007

See your talk page. No, I don't think Bad Blood Part 1 (DH episode) meets the criteria for a notable episode of this series.

Please always sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes ~~~~ pablo_hablo. 06:19, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay?

is it ok to advertise a different site on my user page? Wrigty 00:59, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Corinna Fugate

I need help, bad.

I wrote my story, my life.

All of it.

Are you familiar with Well if you look there you'll find the most horrid hate site doiirected at me.

I NEED this artcle to go up and stay up. Please help me with it.

I finished writing it, please look and help me, I dont know how to make it any better...

PLEASE HELP

Corinna —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahylju (talk • contribs)

I am really sorry to bother you..but I uploaded a photo of my album cover and dont know how to get the picture on the page I made.

My photo says under it "Corinna Fugate 2007" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahylju (talk • contribs)

If you look at your talk page User_talk:Sarahylju there's some information. If the Kansas City Star, or anyone else who has written about Corinna Fugate has a website, you could find the relevant pages and link to them. pablo_hablo.

Please help me Thank you God bless you COrinna —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahylju (talk • contribs)

I am a fan of Corinnas' I want to help her get the truth story about her life. There are hate sites lying about her and she does not deserve that. She is a good person and I am her fan, Sarah

Please tell me is the article ok?

This page is not about me I am only a fan of Corinna Fugate.

I uploaded a picture of her but cannot figure out how to put it in her article, can you please tell me how to do this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahylju (talk • contribs)

I'm confused as to who you are, but anyway. Picture's in. Article should conform to WP:N, WPNPOV and especially take note of WP:COI. Happy editing. pablo_hablo.